There is a "BIG LOGICAL FLAW" in saying Everything is changing/impermanent.
Please see ...
MOTION is always W.R.T something thats not moving.
A Change means w.r.t something that's not changing.
So Earth is moving ... w.r.t ? the Sun/Stars.
Earth cannot be moving without a "Frame of Reference" that's stationary.
So when I say, Everything is moving
... who recognizes that change?
If the recognizer is also changing ... who recognizes this change in the recognizer ?
A change ... or a movement... is always w.r.t a changeless Entity.
So with respect to what is this changing ?
"Change is the only thing thats constant" ... is a logical flaw ... coz , what about the truth value of this statement then ?
Love!
Silence
Bookmarks