Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: An odd but fitting analogy for the soul

  1. #1
    Join Date
    September 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Age
    33
    Posts
    168
    Rep Power
    182

    An odd but fitting analogy for the soul

    Vannakam,

    This is going to sound odd, but with regards to the body and the soul I would like to posit an analogy. That is of A clear glass of milk.

    In this analogy, the transparent glass is the soul and the body is the milk.

    In my conception, the soul is constant, pure, free and immovable.

    The body is opaque, changes with time and is unlike the soul rather inconstant.

    I believe that the soul is intangible despite this analogy,

    I thought it was an interesting thought, and if anyone has any flaws to point out , or expound on it further I would be gladdened greatly

    Namaste

  2. #2
    Join Date
    September 2010
    Posts
    1,064
    Rep Power
    1014

    Re: An odd but fitting analogy for the soul

    Wouldn't it be the reverse?

    The soul is the essence, what possess all the qualities, therefore the milk.

    And it molds itself according to the container, the glass or the body.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    June 2010
    Location
    Kolkata
    Posts
    834
    Rep Power
    490

    Re: An odd but fitting analogy for the soul

    Quote Originally Posted by Pietro Impagliazzo View Post
    Wouldn't it be the reverse?

    The soul is the essence, what possess all the qualities, therefore the milk.

    And it molds itself according to the container, body or glass.
    Can soul possess qualities ?

    I thought body mind complex has all qualities. Soul is only a reflection of the super soul through the mind to the body. This is pure beyond our imagination, which is attribute-less, eternal, all pervading, unchanging, etc.

    The analogy is the electricity through all gadgets. Gadgets have properties but electricity is the enabler.

    However two together is the system which functions.
    Love and best wishes:hug:

  4. #4
    Join Date
    December 2007
    Age
    63
    Posts
    3,218
    Rep Power
    4728

    Re: An odd but fitting analogy for the soul

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric11235 View Post
    This is going to sound odd, but with regards to the body and the soul I would like to posit an analogy. That is of A clear glass of milk.

    In this analogy, the transparent glass is the soul and the body is the milk.

    In my conception, the soul is constant, pure, free and immovable.

    The body is opaque, changes with time and is unlike the soul rather inconstant.

    I believe that the soul is intangible despite this analogy,

    I thought it was an interesting thought, and if anyone has any flaws to point out , or expound on it further I would be gladdened greatly
    From Upanishad's point of view this analogy is flawed. I think you are trying to see Soul by trying to match its description in BG, Chapater-2.

    If you say that Soul is constant, pure, free and immovable ... it becomes Advaita view which imho, explains Atman (Self) like nothing else. The Atman or Super-soul is One ... and there is nothing except that One. As it is everywhere ... it never moves ... as nothing exists except Atman nothing can be added to it or taken out from it ... so it will always remain the way it is ... i.e. it is permanent & unchanging. Within that Atman ... there are vibrations which "create" individual souls. These individual soul is in essence not-different from the Super-soul but it appears to be different as it is capable of having a separate "i". This individualized soul has no permanent existence .. it arises in the Super-soul and again merges back into it.

    From Dvaita (dualists) point of view, the individual souls are permanent ... but they don't believe that this individualised soul is non-moving and unchanging.

    OM
    "Om Namo Bhagvate Vaasudevaye"

  5. #5
    Join Date
    November 2010
    Posts
    1,278
    Rep Power
    1651

    Re: An odd but fitting analogy for the soul

    Quote Originally Posted by kallol View Post
    Can soul possess qualities ?
    From a Nyaya-Viseshika view point, yes. The school recognizes entities such as dravya [substance], guna [qualities] and karma [action].

    The Nyaya argues that the soul is a dravya which possesses gunas and karmas. I have begun a series of explanations of the Nyaya Darshana here. I plan to add more on that thread in due course.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    June 2010
    Location
    Kolkata
    Posts
    834
    Rep Power
    490

    Re: An odd but fitting analogy for the soul

    If the definition of soul is consciousness + mind, it is obvious that the self or soul will have qualities.

    If the definition of soul is consciousness only then I am not sure, how I can put attributes to it.

    Again there are so many theories out of different way the whole system is defined.

    We always tend to cling to the ones which we can explain, assimilate and feel comfortable.

    So you will have the approaches to the TRUTH from different directions and different theories.
    Love and best wishes:hug:

  7. #7
    Join Date
    September 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Age
    33
    Posts
    168
    Rep Power
    182

    Re: An odd but fitting analogy for the soul

    Vannakam,


    The point I was trying to make is simply the dichotomy of the body vs. the soul in this analogy. I posit it because I do ascribe to Advaita and in fact I had trouble with the analogy for the reason of Atman/Brahman Dichotomy.

    I see ultimate reality as all existing within itself, as in everything is everything, so there is another flaw in my analogy that I could not reconcile. But the point is, the body changes but the soul while accruing karma never changes its ultimate form.

    I see the body as a partition for the soul, but one that is constantly changing and although with form is a malleable object in the physical universe whereas the soul is constant (to me).

    This is why this particular analogy poses both a challenge and makes sense to me. I'm trying to think of a way to describe the soul to somebody as I conceive it in ways everybody can understand which is another reason I posited it.

    However, I would like to thank all contributors thus far as this has been fascinating in its insights

    Namaste

  8. #8
    Join Date
    September 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Age
    33
    Posts
    168
    Rep Power
    182

    Re: An odd but fitting analogy for the soul

    I also ascribe to a Panentheistic conception of the almighty

  9. #9
    Join Date
    December 2007
    Age
    63
    Posts
    3,218
    Rep Power
    4728

    Re: An odd but fitting analogy for the soul

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric11235 View Post
    The point I was trying to make is simply the dichotomy of the body vs. the soul in this analogy. I posit it because I do ascribe to Advaita and in fact I had trouble with the analogy for the reason of Atman/Brahman Dichotomy.

    I see ultimate reality as all existing within itself, as in everything is everything, so there is another flaw in my analogy that I could not reconcile. But the point is, the body changes but the soul while accruing karma never changes its ultimate form.

    I see the body as a partition for the soul, but one that is constantly changing and although with form is a malleable object in the physical universe whereas the soul is constant (to me).

    This is why this particular analogy poses both a challenge and makes sense to me. I'm trying to think of a way to describe the soul to somebody as I conceive it in ways everybody can understand which is another reason I posited it.

    However, I would like to thank all contributors thus far as this has been fascinating in its insights
    Classically, Atman and soul have been explained with the model of Ocean (as Atman/Self) and the waves (souls) or the Infinite Space (Atman) and the space within a pot (souls).

    OM
    "Om Namo Bhagvate Vaasudevaye"

  10. #10
    Join Date
    September 2006
    Age
    71
    Posts
    7,705
    Rep Power
    223

    Re: An odd but fitting analogy for the soul

    hari o
    ~~~~~~

    namasté

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric11235 View Post
    But the point is, the body changes but the soul while accruing karma never changes its ultimate form.
    This, I think needs to be thought through. Karma resides in the field of the 3 guṇa-s. This ātman is perfectly ~stainless~ as the wise say. Completely aloof from any influence of the 3 guṇa-s.

    Now at times people tend to call the soul jīva. This is not the best name for ātman and why at times things get mixed up. Hence the great interest in this understanding and to insure one gets the concepts and ideas aligned properly.

    praām

    यतसà¥à¤¤à¥à¤µà¤‚ शिवसमोऽसि
    yatastvaṠśivasamo'si
    because you are identical with śiva

    _

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Does killing a body damage the soul?
    By Ramakrishna in forum Philosophy
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 05 March 2010, 09:39 PM
  2. Shiva and Dionysos
    By Tyrannos in forum Shaiva
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 25 December 2008, 12:58 PM
  3. the immortal soul and its properties
    By Hiwaunis in forum On Dharma
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 14 October 2007, 08:28 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •