Hello,
A fundamental question quite relevant with this thread:
So A)Parabrhma(supreme Godhead) creates B)ParaSakthi and himself gets divided onto
A1)Brahma,A2)Vishnu and A3)Shiva.
Then how an amsa avatar of A2) can be A) himself where, in him, he clearly lacks the A1) and A2) attributes of A).
Is the conception only because of Srimad Bhagwat Gita?Pardon my ignorance regarding my knowledge of scriptures and sastras.
Taking hints from this thread , Lord Krishna mentions that he was Yoga yukta in Kurushetra while he was speaking Srimad Bhagawat Gita.Could that be it was Parabrahma himself speaking in Kuruksetra & not an avatar of A2)?.Because Lord Krishna mentions clearly that among the 11 Rudras he is sankara and among the 12 Adityas he is Vishnu.So how can Lord Vishnu be thought of as A)? Also how can an avatar of A2) says that he is A2 among the 12 Adityas?Arent these contradictory unless we conclude that it was the Supreme God head ,who is beyond A 1,2 and 3 s,was speaking in the battlefield and not an avatar of A2) ?
Another question though not relevant to this thread:
Since Guru is saksat Parabrahma ,worshipping him would be worshipping the Supreme Godhead A) which in turn means worshipping all the deties.
So in this way we will have less fights and arguments regarding who is superior and who is inferior among Gods etc.Am i right or wrong?
Regards.
Bookmarks