Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: Bhagavan Ramana Maharshi's Self Inquiry - Explained...

  1. #21
    Join Date
    December 2007
    Age
    63
    Posts
    3,218
    Rep Power
    4728

    Re: Bhagavan Ramana Maharshi's Self Inquiry - Explained...

    Namaste ameyAtma,

    How are your posts helping the intent of this thread ? Please stick to the topic. I am afraid, this thread is on way to getting derailed completely. Posts considered trying to derail the topic may be deleted.

    OM
    "Om Namo Bhagvate Vaasudevaye"

  2. #22

    Re: Bhagavan Ramana Maharshi's Self Inquiry - Explained...

    Quote Originally Posted by devotee View Post
    Namaste ameyAtma,

    How are your posts helping the intent of this thread ? Please stick to the topic. I am afraid, this thread is on way to getting derailed completely. Posts considered trying to derail the topic may be deleted.

    OM
    Dear Devotee ji,
    I should say that its my mistake, as I started by questioning. From next time I will try to ensure that the discussions regarding a topic are done in a separate thread so that the main thread itself is not disturbed.

    As such Supreme Bhakti and Self Inquiry are one and the same. Only difference is in the view points. That said, what you mentioned is true: the main purpose of the post should be maintained, for which i am responsible in this particular case.

    Love!
    Silence
    Come up, O Lions, and shake off the delusion that you are a sheep

  3. #23

    Re: Bhagavan Ramana Maharshi's Self Inquiry - Explained...

    SELF INQUIRY POST 7:

    We have discussed what is not Self Inquiry till now. Now let us start looking into what is Self Inquiry. To start with , I will present what I understand it as and then substantiate my claims with the aid of quotes of Ramana and various scriptures.

    First of all, the essential teaching of Ramana Maharshi is not "Ask Who am I". His essential teaching is "Just Be" and only when someone complained that I cannot "Just Be", did he suggest "Inquire Who cannot just Be".

    So , the fundamental teaching is "Just Be" ! When a person cannot Just Remain, Self Inquiry is a "Technique" that can bring him back to Himself. This is what Self Inquiry is about.

    As such the external practice itself does not matter. whether I ask "Who am I" or "Naan Yaar" or do not ask any questions but revert back to myself , it should not matter. What I do , externally is not what defines Self Inquiry. Even as ... whether i chant a prayer or not ... if i remain silent "with" God, its prayer. the external chanting , with mind reveling in something else ... is not prayer. Even so , asking "Who am i" without reverting to Self is not self inquiry.

    So Self Inquiry is ... lets define ... "Any technique I use to remain with myself" ... a tool for Self Abidance. When I take myself to be the mind, any tool I use to revert back to see myself as untouched by mind is Self inquiry. Whether i say "Who am i" or simply remain as "I AM" , its just the same. External method should not matter. So also, if someone is able to simply chant the name of God to "Just Be" he is doing Self Inquiry. While a person who keeps asking "Who am i" ... in darkness hoping for some answer is confused and is not doing Self Inquiry.

    I have just set a context for Self Inquiry. We need a proper definition... a clear and precise one... so for that I use the following statement from Ashtavakra Gita. I can think of no better statement about Self Inquiry :

    यदि देहं पृथक् कृत्य चिति विश्राम्य तिष्ठसि ।
    अधुनैव सुखी शान्तो बन्धमुक्तो भविष्यसि ॥१-४॥


    If you detach yourself from the body and remain relaxed as Awareness, Immediately you experience happiness, calmness and freedom from bondage.

    A few people will try to disagree since the source of this statement is from ashtavakra gita and not Ramana's gospel. God bless those who think on those lines. As for me, I will support my claim with through analysis in the posts to follow.

    So this definition .... Detaching yourself from body and remaining relaxed in Awareness is called Self Inquiry.

    Ramana gave a simple method if detach from body and remain as Awareness. There may be many equivalent ways... its not the external method but the actual "Detachment from body to relax into awareness" that should be called Self Inquiry. Remaining Relaxed in Awareness is called "Just Be". We will see all this clearly and precisely as these posts continue ....


    Come up, O Lions, and shake off the delusion that you are a sheep

  4. #24
    Join Date
    December 2007
    Age
    63
    Posts
    3,218
    Rep Power
    4728

    Re: Bhagavan Ramana Maharshi's Self Inquiry - Explained...

    Namaste SS,

    Spiritual seekers have a very strange habit: they are always looking for a way to reach, attain,discover,experience, or realize the Self. They try many things because they cannot comprehend that they are already the Self. This is like running around looking for one's eyes with one's own eyes.
    My feeling is that though the above is perfectly OK from the point of view of a Self-realised soul, just believing in above and do nothing (as we already are which is the highest Truth), may lead to further delusion. Why do I say this ? I have seen many Internet-debaters believing that they are already Self-realised (Though, with the above, it becomes fallacious and yet I am using this term to differentiate the two conditions in absence of any better term). However, when you find that they are still riddled with greed/egoism and other weaknesses, you start feeling that this is all hollow claim and actually they are badly deluded.

    What do you say on this ?

    OM
    "Om Namo Bhagvate Vaasudevaye"

  5. #25

    Re: Bhagavan Ramana Maharshi's Self Inquiry - Explained...

    Dear Devotee,
    Namasthe !
    Thank you for the question.

    The teaching of Vedanta is "You are Purna/Complete or Fulfilled". It is not "You have to become Fulfilled".

    The only problem is with someone who has not discovered that inner fulfillment ... but somehow developed attachment to this "Claim" that "I am Fulfilled".

    Vedanta Panchadasi (vidhyaranya swami) argues : Even when a person does not see himself as fulfilled, but claims he is fulfilled ... its still fine since the statement is not false. In the wake of Knowledge (True discovery), the statement does not get negated. So, as such its good and perfectly fine to believe and have conviction on this. Ribhu Gita says that firm conviction becomes the primary means to actual discovery.... because anyways we are that.

    The problem however is when a person says "I am Fulfilled --- You are Not"... the statements "I am not Fulfilled" or "You are Not Fulfilled" are lies... they perpetuate ignorance and are never a vedantic statement.

    We should never try to prove to someone that "they are not fulfilled" -- because such an attempt is against vedantic vision. So my approach is ... if someone has not yet discovered fulfillment but claims it ... i appreciate the claim and agree ... until a moment where he says "someone else is not fulfilled or that he himself has some problems"... and then correct the vision so that he sees himself as ever fulfilled.


    A fulfilled person naturally and automatically acts out of inner completeness ... so compassion, clarity and simplicity are automatic expressions.

    Love!
    Silence
    Come up, O Lions, and shake off the delusion that you are a sheep

  6. #26

    Re: Bhagavan Ramana Maharshi's Self Inquiry - Explained...

    Dear Devotee,
    I would further like to add:
    In Vedantic learning, one should refrain from categorizing people as "Low", "Medium", "High" ... or "realized", "unrealized", "very materialistic" etc.... whenever we see such divisions in the scriptures they are only to aid us improve ... not to use it as a yardstick categorize people.


    A student of vedanta is supposed to learn and keep improving himself ... that we are all evver fulfilled is given... so we have to see it again and again with the aid of a teacher so that we can effortlessly see ourselves as such ... and so ... naturally discover inner completeness and satisfaction....

    there is total acceptance ... and joy all along !

    its a beautiful journey all along. everyone is welcome to live it ... everyone is welcome with open hands to discover their own inner fulfillment which is already given ... free !

    Love!
    Silence
    Come up, O Lions, and shake off the delusion that you are a sheep

  7. #27
    Join Date
    December 2007
    Age
    63
    Posts
    3,218
    Rep Power
    4728

    Re: Bhagavan Ramana Maharshi's Self Inquiry - Explained...

    Namaste Silence,

    My intent was not to categorise anyone but to emphasize upon dangers hidden for unprepared seekers in assuming that they have attained what they have not yet attained. Upanishads have warned at quite a few places that this highest knowledge should not be imparted to each and everyone indiscriminately. What is the harm, if everyone is already the Self or nobody has to realise anything ?

    My post is not to counter what you offered but just to clarify my position on this issue. Maharshi Ramana does talk of various instruments to attain realisation. In his book "Reflections" he advises the following instruments :

    a) Contemplation (Who am I ?) --- for seekers who have no problem in concentration and who are capable of differentiating between Self and not-self.

    b) Devotion to God (Bhakti) --- For those whose mind is not at rest and they can't concentrate and discriminate easily.

    c) Meditation --- This is another instrument to bring the restless mind in control.

    d) PrANAyAm (Breath control) --- Prescribed for those who are just the beginners and have very restless minds.

    These instruments help us in discarding everything what is not-self and stay in Self. The mind has to learn to be silent without a chatter. Only when this is achieved, with the grace of Guru the Self shines and then we realise our true nature.

    We are already Self and we don't have to become or convert into Self ... this is absolutely true. However, we stick to strong identification with not-self like our body/ego/intellect/past impressions etc. This dirt which covers the Self must be removed and the state when it is removed is Self-realisation.

    The above is my understanding but I can't claim that it is flawless.

    OM
    "Om Namo Bhagvate Vaasudevaye"

  8. #28

    Re: Bhagavan Ramana Maharshi's Self Inquiry - Explained...

    Dear Devotee ji,
    Namasthe!

    I am really happy to see your posts and the questions.

    1. Scriptures do state again and again that this knowledge should not be presented to those who are not eligible for it. Yoga Vasishta makes it very clear:

    This knowledge is for one who is not totally deluded(Who does not seek this knowledge), nor for the one who is fully liberated (since he does not need). It is for one who understands he is bound (to understand i am bound means i am not fully deluded. It means i understand clearly. I am a seeker) and wants to find a way out of the bondage.
    I have not seen a better description for qualification. Do you feel you are bound and seek to find a way out of it through study of scriptures and by learning from Sadhus ? If yes, you are eligible for it. If no! then you either dont need this knowledge or not eligible for it yet.

    There are other places where sadhana chatushtayam etc are mentioned. These are qualities we should develop as we study. One of my professors used to state the prerequisites for a course and add: Either you come with these prerequisites and learning will be easy or you are ready to work harder and pick up these prerequisites as the course progresses.

    So The qualifications can be acquired quickly if the desire for liberation is strong.


    Finally , regarding Ramana's teachings .... Though these are all different externally --- what happens within is just the same. For example: externally i may be chanting a prayer with the aid of which I resolve myself and remain as "Self"! Externally i may do a little bit of pranayama ... internally i remain as Self with its aid. Externally i might ask "Who am i" ... to Just Be as Self !

    Externally there are seeming differences in the methods. internal abidance is the end for all. But Ramana categorized these as superior or inferior since ... if i need the aid of loud chanting to be with myself ... i cannot do it anywhere or everywhere ! If I can simply do japa and be with myself ... its a little better , because there is no external aid needed. I can do it in a train or a cab. But then i cannot do japa while working [until atleast it transforms to ajapa] ... so to remain with Self without the aid of any such means is said to be superior, since i can be it 24 7! And whether or not i can remain as Self 24 7 depends on my understanding and conviction alone !

    Love!
    Silence
    Come up, O Lions, and shake off the delusion that you are a sheep

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Gunas and the Brain differences
    By atanu in forum Canteen
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05 August 2010, 11:33 PM
  2. A Personal Hindu Library
    By saidevo in forum Dharma-related Websites
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 17 March 2009, 12:31 AM
  3. Is "I-I" experience of Ramana Dvaita?
    By satay in forum Philosophy
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 26 July 2008, 01:36 AM
  4. Svetasvatara Upanishad
    By soham3 in forum Upanishads & Aranyakas
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 27 April 2008, 03:31 AM
  5. Meditation and Concentration
    By atanu in forum Jnana
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 28 October 2007, 05:09 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •